All of the class of 7H is welcome.

This is a blog for homework, ranting, news, basically like an online newspaper for 7H.

Monday, November 7, 2011

MW3 or Battleshi-- Battlefield 3?

Well, we have been having an ongoing debate on whether Modern Warfare 3, the 8th installment in the Call of Duty franchise is better than Battleshi--Battlefield 3. I know, I know, I'm showing a lot of personal bias here, but seriously? You can't compare Battlefield to Call of Duty. THEY ARE TWO DIFFERENT GAMES! Battlefield focuses on gameplay that involves working with your team mates more often. Whereas, in Call of Duty, the gameplay focuses on the sole player, in that they are giving the player customizable abilities that suit their gameplay style. Also, in Battlefield, from a gamer's point of view, the multiplayer maps are just too big. For people who are used to playing Call of Duty, and somehow ended up trying to play the beta, (kof* Me and Yueyang kof*) it's very hard to find a person in the map. And when you do, they end up killing you before you get a chance to kill them. In Call of Duty however, maps are just the right sizes for any weapon you choose to use.

In Call of Duty, there are many things that allow players to make themselves "pro" at the game. For example, quick scoping makes you feel like a bau5 when you do it, because mostly, that's what Major League Gamers do. (YES THERE IS AN MLG LEAGUE IN THE WORLD, OKAY?!) But in Battlefield, all you do is run around a gigantic map with all this equipment that you don't get to use. Coming from my point of view, as i have played both franchises, I believe that Call of Duty is the best first person shooter franchise between the two. Simply because of its elegant simplicity that allows players to do what they want when they want.

There is a reason why during high stakes game battles they always choose Call of Duty as the game to play. You don't see many game battles where they play Battlefield, do you?
Anyways, I've made my point. Feel free to disagree with me by creating another post stating why Battlefield is better.

7 comments:

  1. Doesn't matter, I'm gonna delete this

    ReplyDelete
  2. BF3 Good Stuff
    Destructible Environment
    Usable vehicles
    Teamwork
    Huge maps
    More players a map
    Better graphics


    Bad stuff
    Boring when you can't find anyone
    Shaky cameras
    Lag
    Vehicles may be stolen, exploded, etc
    Shaky movement

    MW3 good stuff
    HD with no lag
    More fast paced and more action
    Large array of killstreaks/equipment
    More customization
    More people online
    More game modes
    More exciting campaign
    Way less camping
    Survival mode
    Spec Ops


    MW3 bad stuff
    Kids yelling in the mics
    Rage when someone is better than you
    Almost indestructable cover
    Nowhere is safe
    No vehicles

    ReplyDelete
  3. btw i just tried it out and i loved it. graphics were phenomenal. storyline...... well i was only on the first mission. very realistic as well

    ReplyDelete